Mr Block: He's against organization

Capitalisms catch 22, you need to spend money to make money.

Loafers Glory 04: Holidays

Episode four of Loafers Glory is about holidays, we have stories and songs about Christmas, Hanukkah and Kwanzaa. We also have an account of the New York News Guild strike that ended on Christmas day with the Newspaper companies conceding. We Christmas songs from the Basque community in Idaho, Congolese songs for Kwanzaa, and Shalom by Richard Tucker and a Mish Mosh by Mickey Katz.



We also have an account about the time Utah went to jail, and the history of the 1913 Miners Strike and the massacre at the Italian Hall, by the mine company guards. We also have some poetry and a few more funny anecdotes sprinkled in. My favourite is the story of the last living Wobbly.

Mr Block: He races for a job

You know this seems familiar to me.

Mr Block: Bull con keeps him going

"Remember, BULL---- always works." Sadly often too true.

Mr Block: He is one of those Cascarets

The wonders of competition.

Mr Block: He recieves a Christmas Present

Now, now don't you know its better to give then to receive Mr Block?

Mr Block: He isn't afraid of the boss

Oh Mr Block who do you think your fooling?

Mr Block: He loses his job

The truth is, there are some workers even the IWW is glad to see get the sack.

Mr Block: He becomes an Editor

Possibly one of the oldest examples of fourth wall leaning. Don't worry though they brought Mr Block back.

Mr Block: He leaves the Harvest with his Stake

Sadly even the bird seems to have more class conciousness then poor old Mr Block.

Mr Block: His Patriotism is Appreciated

Crazy Chris seems about as sane as Uncle Sam to me.

Mr Block: He finds a place to flop

He's right about one thing, this sure ain't right.

Mr Block: He goes to the Dakota Harvest

Oh Mr Block will you ever learn?

Red Evangelicals: Exodus

Well after examining the origins of the RCP’s institutional homophobia it’s time to look at the practical effects of that policy. After all why single out the RCP when plenty of other Parties have produced similar homophobic policies and statements? Well because the RCP didn’t bother waiting for the Revolution and put theory into practice.

But first a quick timeline of the various policy evolutions in case of confusion.

1973: Revolutionary Union publishes “On Homosexuality” a paper justifying the exclusion of homosexuals for being decadent, bourgeois and counterrevolutionary. The paper becomes its policy and the policy of the RCP till 1988.

1988: Due to the growth of the Gay Rights movement particularly concerning the AID’s epidemic and attacks by the religious right and increasing resistance to both pressure mounts on the RCP to change its tune. So a compromise was made, the new line advocated in “On the Question of Homosexuality and the Emancipation of Women.” Softened its tone, -well allegedly- but still attacked homosexuality. Only now it was just contributing to female oppression and narcissistic rather than completely counterrevolutionary. 

2001-2: The pressure from within and without keeps mounting on the RCP over its homophobic policy. Fearing it’ll tear the party apart; RCP leaders embark on an unprecedented attempt to draft a new policy via the 2changetheworld website. A new policy is drafted which they claim is now pro homosexual and allows Gay members.

Despite the open homophobic policy some Gays didn’t get the hint, for some it was a case of it just not being an issue in their local area, until a Party officer found out. Others it was a case of their desires to change the world and the sincere belief that the RCP was the only way to do this that led to a harsh lifestyle of denial. But for quite a few cases that I’m aware of they didn’t know they had same sex attractions until after they joined the party because they were high school aged and hadn’t quite matured yet. But whatever reason going anywhere near the RCP was a very grave mistake on their part, which would lead to very nasty consequences.

An excellent source for this policy and its very odd and disgusting practices comes from Kasama and its users who were in the RCP. They published a series of posts by Gay and Bi former members detailing their experiences then collected them into a PDF called Out of the Red Closet.  While I find Kasama problematic I do recommend Out of the Red Closet for those wanting to understand this type of homophobia and just how vicious these types of parties can be even when they are small and have no access to state power.  It’s also very revealing about the mind-set such organisations cultivate in there members. But more on that last part later.

One weakness of Out of the Red Closet is its lack of detail concerning dates and places, this makes it hard to pin point where and when exactly what the RCP did occurred this may seem like a minor point but I feel it’s important given that the RCP has been busy denying its homophobic past and trying to convince prospective new members they’ve changed.  Though it is still possible to figure out roughly when most of these incidents took place.

The Trials

When the RCP was confronted with the spectre homosexuality they appear to have made use of two options, sometimes switching when one didn’t work. First was the rather obvious expulsion, or terminating membership applications. Apparently to join the RCP you had to convince them you were Revolutionary material through a series of chats/interrogations.

Several years after returning to the work with the RCP, and after an appropriate amount of self-criticism for previous decision to withdraw from politics for a spell, the leader of the group within the RCP that I worked with agreed to meet with me to talk about join­ing the party. 

Part of these chats involved a background interview including questions on where you live and with whom. Asking for details about spouses, family and lodgers seems quite nosey and needless but it seems to have been a way to enforce the no Gays policy. 

As part of this process of joining the party I had a sit down meeting with a party leader in which I was in­terviewed about my personal background including my education and work history and, interestingly, where I had lived and with whom I had lived. This whole pro­cess seemed a little excessive but still perfunctory until I mentioned that Mark had been my lover.

In this example after finding out Andrew Copper is Gay they put his membership application on hold. For context Andrew had been working with the RCP for a few years prior to this in its front groups, protesting the Panama invasion and first Gulf War. This means that this event took place after the 1988 “compromise”. But instead of an immediate barring from joining the RCP invited him to another series of chats with an altogether different purpose. 

My request to join the party was “put on hold” (as my leader put it) and I began the first of a series of meetings with my leader, a party member who was a former lesbian, and several others from the party to discuss the Homosexuality Question.

A former Lesbian, one of several things happened here, either she is bisexual and gave in to RCP pressure to suppress her feelings for females. She is still a Lesbian and either suppressing her feelings, or suppressing her feelings and trying to make herself straight. None of those possibilities seem too pleasant, but since she’s now taking an active part in the same abuses that she was victimised by I can’t really be all that sympathetic. Least that was what I thought until I read a little further.

We talked about what it meant and how it applied specifically to our lives (well, to my life). The party member who was a former lesbian told me her story of being hurt by men, turning to women to avoid pain, feeling like women were superior to men and wanting a society of just women who loved and nurtured each other, etc. The punch line of her story, of course, is that she realized she was wrong and joined the party.

It now seems more likely the party took advantage of her when she was in a very vulnerable condition. So exploiting the emotionally vulnerable and Gay bashing at the same time, efficiently disgusting work that.  Anyway these “discussions” continued for a while until Andy made it clear it wasn’t going to work. This attempt at Queer shaming isn’t an isolated incident, and it’s not even the worst example given in Out of the Red Closet though the implications that they took advantage of an emotionally troubled and possibly abused woman to justify their vile line puts it near the top. Once Andy proved unresponsive to the Party’s powers of persuasion they ended the application and effectively barred him from attending their rallies and bookshops. Even though he had been volunteering for years and had made friends and acquaintances. They also instructed members who knew him not to talk to him and they complied.

This major part of my life that consumed much time and energy and was so transformative for me per­sonally ended unceremoniously one day at a Starbucks. I met with a party leader (the one who had organized the homosexuality discussions the year before) at a prearranged time. I turned in my key to the bookstore. (I heard years later that they had already had the locks changed months before that when it was remembered that I still had a key!)

Now throwing someone out after years of hard work is a pretty rotten thing to do. But sadly it was the most benign thing they did. See Andy despite being an active volunteer and supporter hadn’t actually managed to get into the workers’ paradise yet, since the party didn’t want to squander valuable minions, I mean Comrades they had a different way of dealing with Gays already in the organisation.

You may be wondering how that’s possible since you have to declare current and past lovers to get your membership card. Well the answer is simple, most of them didn’t know they were Gay yet because they were in its youth section and where often still in High school. Yes the RCP would do to impressionable teens and young adults what they did to Andy a fully grown man whose independent and had already come to terms with his own identity.

The first account in Red Closet and the first one written on this subject that encouraged the others to come forward was Libri Devrim’s. Her story starts in the 80’s presumably before the 1988 reform given the nature of her discussions. She was a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade (RCYB) and realised she was gay when she started crushing on another female RCYB member. Coming out as it were caused problems with her family and attracted the attention of the RCP’s officers. She also had to take part in these “special talks” with a number of senior party members about why being Gay is bad. 

They made a series of deductive arguments – very divorced from reality and my own situation – that les­bianism was an ideological choice that embodied a re­formist political program and that was therefore not compatible with being a communist revolutionary. Let me remind you that all of this was happening to me when I was a high school student – just barely starting to sort out life, love and sexuality.

Now doing this to anyone is bad enough, but doing this to an impressionable young woman is just cruel. But as with most things where the RCP is concerned it gets worse. At first it seems like these discussions are just attempts to put peer pressure on the individual to get them to go along with the official line, but it appears to have been in part an active attempt to humiliate them as well.

I was told that I was viewing the girl in the RCYB that I liked as a sex object, that I was objectifying her because I had sexual thoughts about her.

In one painful meeting (at a Burger King – I never wanted to eat there again after this!) I admitted tear­fully that, yes, I had imagined seeing her naked while masturbating.

Yes a group of adult RCP Cadre in a public setting brought a high school aged girl to tears whilst getting her to give them intimate details about her sexual life. It was at this point that I decided to make the RCP the subject of its own piece, this is just disgusting behaviour, and yet it somehow gets worse. Since Libri continued to stay within the RCP her life became dominated by self-denial or self-criticism in Maoist speak.  She also had to undergo “training” and supervision to be given the privilege of serving the Party.

They were even planning on making her move but that just wasn’t feasible until she left high school. Libri kept up the official party line for several years though she did start “acting up” again, though by her own admission she couldn’t bring herself to publicly say she disagreed with the party pretending instead to not understand. After years of this institutional abuse she got desperate and started dating a guy.

I was never told I had to start dating a guy, but I felt im­mense pressure to prove that I wasn’t a bourgeois fem­inist-separatist, that I was a revolutionary communist who was fully committed to bringing out change in this world.

Obviously this relationship didn’t work out so I guess we can also add homewrecking to the list of RCP crimes. 

We moved in to­gether and I hoped that eventually I would develop feelings for him, but it didn’t happen. I liked him a lot and loved spending time with him. But I dreaded hav­ing sex with him.

Yes apparently Libri was under so much pressure she tried to get a man to “fix” herself. That’s just really, really sad. The relationship broke down (obviously) and eventually Libri finally saw sense and left the Party. However it seems the RCP had the gall to rub salt in the wound and used her leaving as justification for their disgusting policy in the first place. Apparently though that’s standard practice when someone leaves the RCP to claim it was that ex-members personal failings. Very dishonest and very exploitative, but it is consistent with the internal logic that the RCP and other Vanguards seem to employ.

So far we’ve seen a couple of the examples from Red Closet but apart from making you a bit sick it should also show that this wasn’t an isolated incident. In order to do these things in an organisation spread across a Nation and all with the involvement of local RCP leaders over periods of weeks and months must have required the support from the top. And since the leadership of the RCP are the ones who set the policies and party rules they’d have to come up with operational procedures to handle discipline.

The comments sections of Red Closet also reveal a few more interesting and thankfully more mundane aspects of the RCP’s homophobic policy, according to Mike Ely former member of the RCP and “Leading Light” of the Kasama project during the 80’s the party refused to allow any acknowledgement of the abuses LGBTQ groups and people suffered at the hands of the Imperialist system, they would remove anything at all related to Gays in their publications. Given its policies and treatment of its own members this shouldn’t really be that surprising, party papers are notorious for selective reporting but it does confirm that the RCP as an organisation were completely opposed to the LGBTQ community. And kept in mind since many current RCP publications claim that despite their policies they were always supportive of Gays defending themselves from attacks from the right.

You see it’s the combination of bullying and exploiting their own members even when young and emotionally vulnerable and attempting to undermine and smear those actually willing to fight that really stood out for me. Bigoted thought and speech just doesn’t affect me anymore since I’m used to it and I know that when it bothers to hide behind intellectual speak like with the RCP it’s merely trying to appear more than it is. There are several more accounts in Red Closet about the RCP’s victimisation of its own members with some extra bits in its commentary pages, but I’ve covered most of the pattern of behaviour and continuing would mean copying and pasting the whole thing. I will be coming back to it later though.